CAP 2018-19 has provided the following guidance for preparing an effective research and creative activity statement.
A candidate’s statement should briefly describe the candidate’s research and creative activities during the review period. Statement length may vary, but the description should be succinct and broadly accessible. It is often helpful to write separate sections for each major strand of research/creative activity and to list the relevant publications (or other forms of output) in the relevant sections using the numbering system of the CV and review profile (UC-AP-10).
When the research/creative activities were performed as part of a collaborative team, it is important to spell out the candidate’s specific contributions to the collaborations. This can be done in the research statement and in the review profile (UC-AP-10), where the candidate’s contributions can be described in a sentence or two after each listed publication (or other form of output). For publications, it is generally useful to note whether the candidate is corresponding author, and which of the co-authors may be the candidate’s mentees.
The nature of collaborative grants or other funding sources should be described, including the candidate’s role in proposal preparation, grant administration (e.g., what fraction of the funds is coming to the candidate’s unit?), research contributions, and so forth.
For promotion to tenure, in fields where publishing with advisors is the norm, candidates should indicate how their research/creative contributions have become independent of their previous mentors. That said, candidates need not shy away from collaborations with other faculty. The campus, including CAP, recognizes that such collaborations can be very productive or even essential in some fields.
For all reviews candidates should consult the APM and CAP FAQ pages, which detail the rules and procedures used by CAP to evaluate all aspects of personnel files, including research and creative activities.
Resources to guide description of collaborative contributions to research:
Second Piece of Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness
APM 210 states “It is the responsibility of the department chair to submit meaningful statements, accompanied by evidence, of the candidate’s teaching effectiveness at lower-division, upper-division, and graduate levels of instruction. More than one kind of evidence shall accompany each review file.”
In 2016-17 all review files were required to have two forms of evidence. Based on review of the evidence submitted as well as discussions with CAP and the Provost Leadership Academy participants, the Vice Provost of Academic Personnel collaborated with the Division of Teaching Excellence and Innovation, and developed the following guidelines that we hope will help faculty in preparing materials that will be useful in the review process.
1. Reflective teaching statement
Different from a description of teaching philosophy, reflective statements focus on specific examples of teaching approaches, and describe how you assess and revise your practices over time. Learn more.
2. Peer evaluation from a colleague
Constructive peer evaluations provide evaluative and actionable feedback on teaching. Learn more.
3. Other evidence
Other evidence will be accepted including but not limited to evidence of student learning gains, or awards that demonstrate deep and/or broad impact of instructional activities.
Faculty might also want to consider submitting a completed Teaching Practice Inventory (TPI), a tool to evaluate your classroom activities developed by Nobel prize winning physicist and leader in higher education evidence-based teaching practices, Carl Weiman and colleagues (read more here).
In most cases a syllabus without an accompanying reflective statement is not very helpful in evaluating teaching effectiveness.
Statement on University, Professional and Public Service Activities
APM 210 states that review committees shall judge the candidate’s performance in professional activity and University and public service.
“The faculty plays an important role in the administration of the University and in the formulation of its policies. Recognition should therefore be given to scholars who prove themselves to be able administrators and who participate effectively and imaginatively in faculty government and the formulation of departmental, college, and University policies. Service by members of the faculty to the community, State, and the nation, both in their special capacities as scholars and in areas beyond those special capacities when the work done is at a sufficiently high level and of sufficiently high quality, should likewise be recognized in [merit and promotion reviews].”
It is recommended that a candidate briefly describe their service activities during the review period (be as succinct as possible). The statement should not list service assignments and membership on committees (which should be included on AP-10). Rather, in the service statement, the candidate should lay out in concrete detail their efforts and contributions to service and leadership, length of involvement, concrete outcomes from committees/initiatives and the candidate’s own specific contributions to achieving those outcomes.
For instance, if a candidate has served on an editorial board, they should indicate the size of the board, their specific role, such as how many papers they handled per year, and how time consuming this was. If a candidate served on a conference organizing committee or technical program committee, it is useful to know how big the conference was and what specifically the candidate’s duties were. If a candidate served on a department committee, it is helpful to indicate how many hours of work per year did the service require and specify the faculty member’s role and contributions.
The Use of Contributions to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Statements for Academic Positions at the University of California produced by UCAADE and EO/AA, states that “DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion] contributions should be assessed at all levels of the review process as aspects of research, teaching, and/or service.”
The Vice Provost for Academic Personnel, the 2017-18 and 2018-19 Provost’s Leadership Academy participants, and the Council on Academic Personnel considered the question of how faculty should submit evidence of contributions to inclusive excellence (see UCI’s Commitment to Inclusive Excellence) as part of their review file and suggest the following options:
- Completion of AP-10 diversity sections. Completion of AP-10 diversity sections. Faculty may continue to submit information related to diversity activities by completing one or more of the diversity sections on the UC-AP-10 document.
- Inclusive Excellence Activities Statement. You are encouraged to also describe your contributions to inclusive excellence in narrative form and upload the statement to AP Review. Click here to see guidance on preparing a statement.
Additional supporting materials to the above may include, but are not limited to:
- A letter from another faculty member, administrator or community leader that describes your contributions to inclusive excellence;
- Description of an award received for contributions to inclusive excellence.
- Guidance for Writing Inclusive Excellence Activities Statement
- UCOP Guidelines for The Use of Contributions to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Statements for Academic Positions at the University of California
- UCI’s Commitment to Inclusive Excellence Preamble
- Office of Inclusive Certificate Program for Faculty
- Guidelines for Writing Diversity Statements for Faculty Applicants (video)
- Assessing Faculty Contributions to Inclusive Excellence