2017 Pay Equity Study Results: SOM – Clinical Sciences

The salary data for all Ladder Rank Faculty in the School of Medicine – Clinical Sciences are plotted below.
As a function of rank, step, and gender:

 
As a function of rank, step, and ethnicity:

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Multiple regression analysis of salary vs rank/step. As indicated in Table 1, the simplest model with only demographic variables shows that relative to white male faculty, women earn salaries that are 13% lower, Asian faculty earn 11% and URM faculty earn 3% lower. Only 4% of salary variation is explained by this model. After all control factors are added, 66% of salary variation is explained by a model with demographic, experience, field, and rank variables. After adjusting for covariates, relative to white male faculty, salaries are 0.3% higher for faculty who are women, 13% higher for Asian, and 27% lower for URM faculty. Asian faculty earned significantly more than white male faculty.

Progression Analysis

The progression data for all Arts Ladder Rank Faculty, are plotted below.  Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Progress by gender:

Progress by ethnicity:

Progress Rate Analysis

Using a simple t-test, the results indicate there isn’t a statistically significant difference in progression rate means by either gender or ethnicity when compared to white male faculty, indicating there is no evidence of biases against promotion. Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Comments are closed