2017 Pay Equity Study Results: Social Ecology

Ladder Rank Salary Data

The salary data for all Ladder Rank Faculty in the School of Social Ecology are plotted below.
As a function of rank, step, and gender:

 
As a function of rank, step, and ethnicity:

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Multiple regression analysis of salary vs rank/step. As indicated in Table 1, the simplest model with only demographic variables shows that relative to white male faculty, women earn salaries that are 4% lower, Asian faculty earn 22% and URM faculty earn 28% lower. Only 15% of salary variation is explained by this model. After all control factors are added, 86% of salary variation is explained by a model with demographic, experience, field, and rank variables. After adjusting for covariates, relative to white male faculty, salaries are 0.2% higher for faculty who are women, 4% lower for Asian, and 4% lower for URM faculty. This model also shows demographic variables are not statistically significant.

Progression Analysis

The progression data for all Social Ecology Ladder Rank Faculty, are plotted below.  Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Progress by gender:

Progress by ethnicity:

Progress Rate Analysis

The results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference in progression rate means by either gender or ethnicity when compared to white male faculty. Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Comments are closed