2016 Pay Equity Study Results: SOM – Clinical Sciences

Ladder Rank Salary Data

The salary data for all Ladder Rank Faculty in the School of Medicine — Clinical Sciences are plotted below.
As a function of rank, step, and gender:

somc-rank-step-gender  
As a function of rank, step, and ethnicity:

somc-rank-step-ethnicity

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Multiple regression analysis of salary vs rank/step. As indicated in Table 1, the simplest model with only demographic variables shows women earn salaries that are 22% lower, Asian and URM faculty earn 37% and 9% less, respectively, compared to their colleagues who are white and male. Eighteen percent of salary variation is explained by this model. As control factors are added to the model, salary differences change significantly with women earning 1% less, Asian faculty earn the same salaries, and URM faculty earn 1% more, compared to white male faculty. The percentage of salary variation explained by the model increases to 96%.

Progression Analysis

The progression data for all School of Medicine (Clinical Sciences) Ladder Rank Faculty, are plotted below.  Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Progress by gender:

somc-progress-by-salary-and-gender
Progress by ethnicity:

somc-progress-by-salary-and-ethnicity

Progress Rate Analysis

The results indicate there isn’t a statistically significant difference in progression rate means by either gender or ethnicity when compared to white male faculty, indicating there is no evidence of biases against promotion. Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Comments are closed