2016 Pay Equity Study Results: SOM – Basic Sciences

Ladder Rank Salary Data

The salary data for all Ladder Rank Faculty in the School of Medicine — Basic Sciences are plotted below.
As a function of rank, step, and gender:

somb-rank-step-gender  
As a function of rank, step, and ethnicity:

somb-rank-step-ethnicity

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Multiple regression analysis of salary vs rank/step. As indicated in Table 1, the simplest model with only demographic variables shows Asian faculty earn salaries that are 43% lower, Women earn 1% more, and URM faculty earn equal salaries, compared to their colleagues who are white and male. Eighteen percent of salary variation is explained by this model. As control factors are added to the model, salary differences change with women earning 2% less, Asian faculty earn 3% less, and URM faculty earn 1% more, compared to white male faculty. The percentage of salary variation explained by the model increases to 99%.

Progression Analysis

The progression data for all School of Medicine (Basic Sciences) Ladder Rank Faculty, are plotted below.  Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Progress by gender:

somb-progress-by-salary-and-gender
Progress by ethnicity:

somb-progress-by-salary-and-ethnicity

Progress Rate Analysis

The results indicate there isn’t a statistically significant difference in progression rate means by either gender or ethnicity when compared to white male faculty, indicating there is no evidence of biases against promotion. Normative progression is defined in the Progression Matrix.

Comments are closed